1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 139 S.E.2d
  5. 139 S.E.2d 243 (1964)
 

IN RE ISLEY'S WILL

No. 605.

139 S.E.2d 243 (1964)

263 N.C. 239

In the Matter of the WILL of Mrs. Lalah Irene Perkins ISLEY.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roberson, Haworth & Reese, High Point, for propounder.

Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter and James G. Exum, Jr., Greensboro, for caveator.

PER CURIAM.

Several times in the charge the judge referred to the paper writing as the "alleged will." Propounder insists this was prejudicial error and amounted to an expression of opinion that it was not in fact a valid will. We do not agree. The propounder's contention arises from a misinterpretation of the following statement from In re Broach's Will, 172 N.C. 520, 90 S.E. 681: "The formal execution (of the paper writing) having thus been formally proven, it was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases