UNITED STATES of America
v.
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Bethlehem Steel Company, Armco Steel Corporation, Edgewater Steel Company, and Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation, Defendants.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
TAYLOR FORGE AND PIPE WORKS, Edgewater Steel Company, Alco Products, Inc., and Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation, Defendants.
United States District Court S. D. New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 5, 1964.
February 5, 1964.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for United States; Allen A. Dobey, Louis Perlmutter, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division, of counsel.
White & Case, New York City, for United States Steel Corp.; Haliburton Fales 2d, New York City, of counsel.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, for Bethlehem Steel Co.; John W. Barnum, New York City, of counsel.
Breed, Abbott & Morgan, New York City, for Armco Steel Corp.; Robert A. Bicks, New York City, of counsel.
Thorp, Reed & Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Edgewater Steel Co.; William C. O'Neil, Charles Weiss, Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel.
Wickes, Riddell, Bloomer, Jacobi & McGuire, New York City, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, Pa., for Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.; Harold F. McGuire, New York City, Robert H. Young, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel.
Patterson, Belknap & Webb, New York City, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Chicago, Ill., for Taylor Forge and Pipe Works; Richard G. Moser, New York City, Joseph E. Wyse, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.
Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland & Kiendl, New York City, for Alco Products, Inc.; Lawrence E. Walsh, Donald T. Fox, New York City, of counsel.
United States District Court S. D. New York.
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.
In each of these two criminal actions all the defendants have joined in a motion to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania sitting at Pittsburgh, pursuant to Rule 21(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The motions in both cases were brought on and heard together.
Each of the indictments, returned by a grand jury in this district, charge a combination...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
