1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 24 Wis.2d
  5. 24 Wis.2d 346 (1964)
 

HEMMIS v. STATE

24 Wis.2d 346 (1964)

HEMMIS, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 30, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Baumblatt & Goodman of Racine, and oral argument by Robert P. Goodman.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Robert D. Martinson, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were George Thompson, attorney general, William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and John Peyton, district attorney of Racine county.

BEILFUSS, J.

The defendant contends (1) that the search and seizure of the automobile was illegal, (2) that search and seizure of his clothing was illegal, and (3) that evidence was insufficient to support a finding of the defendant's guilt.

Search and Seizure.

The state takes the position that search and seizure is not in the case because of the agreement of counsel at the time of the defendant's motion to suppress. The agreement of counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases