1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 239 Or.
  5. 239 Or. 130 (1964)
 

STATE v. MUNSON

239 Or. 130 (1964)

396 P.2d 696

STATE OF OREGON v. MUNSON

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 18, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Raymond Carskadon, Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for the appellant.

Tom P. Price, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PERRY, J.

The defendant was convicted of rape and appeals.

The defendant assigns as error the admission of a photograph taken of the defendant and others at a police line-up at the time the prosecuting witness identified him. On appeal, the defendant contends there was insufficient foundation laid to disclose this photograph was a faithful representation of the occurrence.

1. We are of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases