SPIVAK v. SACHS


21 A.D.2d 348 (1964)

William B. Spivak, Respondent, v. Mary W. Sachs, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 16, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Kashman of counsel (Vincent J. Di Mattina, attorney), for appellant.

Arthur A. Greenfield of counsel (Frederic P. Houston with him on the brief; Otterbourg, Steindler, Houston & Rosen, attorneys), for respondent.

VALENTE, J. P., and STEVENS, J., concur with STEUER, J.; EAGER, J., dissents in opinion, in which McNALLY, J., concurs.


STEUER, J.

The essential facts necessary for resolution of this case are that defendant requested plaintiff, a lawyer admitted to practice in California but not in New York, to come here and render her what assistance he could in matrimonial litigation in which defendant was involved. Plaintiff correctly advised defendant that he would not be able to appear in any action and that the services he could perform...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases