TINSLEY v. MAXWELL

No. 38609.

176 Ohio St. 185 (1964)

TINSLEY v. MAXWELL, WARDEN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 29, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William Tinsley, in propria persona.

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. William C. Baird, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Petitioner in this action in habeas corpus is attacking only his 1961 conviction. He is attacking it not on the basis of any error in the trial court's jurisdiction or denial of his constitutional right in the trial but on a denial of his right to appeal.

Petitioner has filed motions for leave to appeal with the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court of Ohio, which motions have been denied. A petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases