1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 226 Cal.App.2d
  5. 226 Cal.App.2d 123 (1964)
 

PEOPLE v. FRANKS

Docket No. 9570.

226 Cal.App.2d 123 (1964)

37 Cal. Rptr. 800

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. VINCENT B. FRANKS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

April 2, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Philip E. Grey, Assistant City Attorney, and William E. Doran, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Walter L. Gordon, Jr., for Defendants and Respondents.

FILES, J.

[1] The question is whether the subject of gambling has been preempted by the state to the extent that sections 43.13.1 and 43.13.2 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code are invalid. This court has concluded that there is preemption.

The record here comprises four separate cases in which the defendants were charged, in substance, as follows:

Count I: Violation of section 43.13.2 of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases