1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 224 Cal.App.2d
  5. 224 Cal.App.2d 122 (1964)
 

CITY OF PALM SPRINGS v. BURT

Docket No. 7158.

224 Cal.App.2d 122 (1964)

36 Cal. Rptr. 422

CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIAM O. BURT, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District.

January 16, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William O. Burt, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Jerome J. Bunker, City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

COUGHLIN, J.

Defendant and appellant is an attorney at law; was doing business as such in the City of Palm Springs, the plaintiff and respondent, during the fiscal year 1959-1960; and refused to pay a $75 annual license fee imposed by the city's licensing ordinance for that period. The city brought this action to recover the fee in question and obtained judgment against the defendant for the amount thereof, together with a prescribed penalty, from which he has appealed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases