1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 238 Or.
  5. 238 Or. 106 (1964)
 

PETERSON v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.

238 Or. 106 (1964)

393 P.2d 651

PETERSON v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed June 24, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred T. McGill, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were McGill & Clarke, Portland.

Herbert B. Galton, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Goldstein, Galton, Galton & Popick, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

DENECKE, J.

This is an action against an insurer to recover $5,000 under the provisions of the uninsured motorist clause of plaintiff's automobile liability insurance policy. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff for the full amount.

The undisputed facts are that plaintiff was injured when he was struck by an automobile driven by an uninsured motorist. The plaintiff was legally entitled to recover damages against the motorist...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases