ONEONTA DRESS CO. v. N. L. R. B.

Nos. 307 and 412, Dockets 28344 and 28382.

333 F.2d 1 (1964)

ONEONTA DRESS CO., Inc., Edmeston Dress Co., Inc. and Sherwood Fashions, Inc., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. Clodomiro ISOLINO, d/b/a under the trade name and style of Ravena Sportswear, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided June 12, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Manes, Sturim & Laufer, New York City (Arthur M. Laufer, New York City, of counsel), for petitioners in No. 28344.

Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Harold B. Shore, Attys., N. L. R. B., for respondent in No. 28344 and for petitioner in No. 28382.

No appearance for respondent in No. 28382.

Before MOORE and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges, and DIMOCK, District Judge.


DIMOCK, District Judge.

By an order issued June 19, 1963 the National Labor Relations Board found that Oneonta Dress Co., Inc., Edmeston Dress Co., Inc., Sherwood Fashions, Inc. (hereinafter "Oneonta," "Edmeston" and "Sherwood," respectively, and "the petitioners," collectively) and Clodomiro Isolino, doing business as Ravena Sportswear (hereinafter "Ravena") had violated Sections 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U. S.C. §§ 158...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases