PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs appeal a judgment for the defendants in an action arising out of an intersectional automobile collision. Mutually stressed as a vital issue was the relative speeds of the respective vehicles, and the case was submitted to the jury on conflicting testimony including testimony offered by a purported expert who was not an eye witness. On careful examination of the record and arguments we cannot conclude that the jury erred in resolving the issues...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
