PAYNE v. GRIFFIN


239 Or. 91 (1964)

396 P.2d 573

PAYNE v. GRIFFIN

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed and remanded November 12, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H.B. Johnson, Baker, argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Jackson & Johnson, Baker.

Harold M. Daron, Baker, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Grant, Fuchs, Rose & Daron, Baker.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.


REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GOODWIN, J.

This is an action to recover money alleged to be due upon an oral contract made by the defendant's testator. The merits of the action are not before us. The issue is the correctness of the trial court's ruling that the action could not be maintained.

The defendant demurred to the plaintiff's amended complaint. The court sustained the demurrer and entered judgment thereon. The plaintiff appeals that ruling.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases