STATE, EX REL. BEEDLE v. KIRACOFE

No. 38443.

176 Ohio St. 149 (1964)

THE STATE, EX REL. BEEDLE, GDN., APPELLEE, v. KIRACOFE, JUDGE, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 22, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Raymond E. Cookston and Mr. Owen Calvin Neff, for appellee.

Messrs. Faust & Harrelson, for appellant.


GIBSON, J.

The first question for determination is whether the relator has the capacity to bring this action in prohibition. The respondent, relying upon the general rule that the death of the ward terminates the guardianship, contends that the relator, as guardian of the deceased ward, is not qualified to prosecute this action. However, the respondent de-emphasizes the fact that those powers and duties necessarily involved in the proper accounting and settlement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases