RAUK v. VOLD

No. 39,091.

268 Minn. 56 (1964)

127 N.W. (2d) 687

RAYMOND RAUK v. HAAKEN J. VOLD.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 17, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Holst, Vogel & Richardson, for appellant.

Murnane, Murnane, Battis & deLambert and Johnson & Johnson, for respondent.


MURPHY, JUSTICE.

This is an appeal from an order denying judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial after a special verdict in favor of plaintiff in an action for personal injuries and for damage to his automobile. Defendant contends that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law and that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. He contends in the alternative that a new trial should be granted because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases