1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 166 So.2d
  5. 166 So.2d 142 (1964)
 

BARBER v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 33075.

166 So.2d 142 (1964)

Leroy BARBER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Clark & Clark and the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 10, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James T. Earle and Masterson & Lloyd, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

E.O. Palermo of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, for Clark and Clark and The Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.

PER CURIAM.

Upon a consideration of the record, briefs and after oral argument, we have concluded that the Florida Industrial Commission committed no error in remanding the matter to the Deputy Commissioner for a re-examination of the extent of the petitioner's permanent disability. The writ of certiorari is, therefore, denied.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C.J., and ROBERTS, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases