1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 226 Cal.App.2d
  5. 226 Cal.App.2d 79 (1964)
 

OSTROWSKI v. MILLER

Docket No. 21460.

226 Cal.App.2d 79 (1964)

37 Cal. Rptr. 790

JOHN L. OSTROWSKI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HUGH A. MILLER, as Receiver, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

March 31, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Carroll, Frank Solomon, Jr., and Patricia C. Remmes for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Di Giorgio & Davis and Thomas R. Davis for Defendant and Respondent.

BRAY, P.J.

Plaintiffs appeal from judgment of dismissal in favor of defendant Hugh A. Miller as receiver for defendant P.S.R. & Associates, entered upon order sustaining with prejudice demurrer without leave to amend.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED.

1. Should the demurrer of defendant receiver have been sustained because of refusal of the Kern County Superior Court to consent to this action against said receiver? Yes.

2. Should the judgment of dismissal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases