1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 82 N.J.
  5. 82 N.J. Super. 222 (1964)
 

RICCIARDI v. DAMAR PRODUCTS CO.

82 N.J. Super. 222 (1964)

197 A.2d 390

JOSEPH RICCIARDI, PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. DAMAR PRODUCTS COMPANY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 4, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Norman Peterkin argued the cause for petitioner-appellant and cross-respondent (Messrs. Friedman & D'Alessandro, attorneys).

Mr. Herman D. Michels argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Messrs. Toner, Crowley, Woelper & Vanderbilt, attorneys; Mr. Marshall Crowley and Mr. Michels, of counsel; Mrs. Andrea C. Balliette, on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and LABRECQUE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, S.J.A.D.

Petitioner's wife, Janet Ann Ricciardi, was killed in an automobile accident while returning from a company picnic. Petitioner's petition for workmen's compensation was resisted by the employer on the grounds that the accident was not compensable and, in any event, petitioner was not a dependent. The Division awarded compensation. The County Court reversed, holding that the accident was compensable but that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases