1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 3 Ohio
  5. 3 Ohio App. 2d 295 (1964)
 

EIKENBARY v. DAYTON

Nos. 2870 and 2871.

3 Ohio App. 2d 295 (1964)

EIKENBARY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF DAYTON, APPELLEE. BEERMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF DAYTON, APPELLEE.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Montgomery County.

Decided December 2, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Coolidge, Wall & Wood and Messrs. Turner, Wells, Granzow & Spayd, for appellants.

Mr. Herbert S. Beane, city attorney, Mr. W. Erwin Kilpatrick, Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Mr. John Lansdale and Mr. Eben Crawford, for appellee.

SHERER, J.

These actions have been consolidated for the purposes of this appeal. The actions are taxpayers' suits challenging various steps taken and to be taken by the city of Dayton in the execution of two urban renewal projects, the Miami-Maple and the Perry-Mead projects. These projects together comprise about fifty-two acres of land in the western downtown area of the city of Dayton, which the city of Dayton proposes to sell to a single developer for the purpose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases