1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 167 So.2d
  5. 167 So.2d 126 (1964)
 

BRUNSWICK CORPORATION v. SITTASON

8 Div. 114.

167 So.2d 126 (1964)

The BRUNSWICK CORPORATION et al. v. Robert Dare SITTASON, Jr., et al.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied September 10, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peach, Caddell & Shanks and Robt. H. Harris, Decatur, for appellants.

Calvin, Gilchrist & Murphree, Decatur, for appellees.

SIMPSON, Justice.

The dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Harwood contains a full statement of the facts which should be referred to in connection with a study of this opinion.

The dissenting opinion concludes that the Brunswick Corporation had within the State of Alabama a "soliciting agent"; that said agent took an order from one Dr. Sittason for bowling equipment; that such order provided that to be binding upon Brunswick Corporation it must be accepted by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases