1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 225 Cal.App.2d
  5. 225 Cal.App.2d 59 (1964)
 

LONG v. CITY OF FRESNO

Docket No. 304.

225 Cal.App.2d 59 (1964)

36 Cal. Rptr. 886

H.H. LONG et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF FRESNO et al., Defendants and Respondents; OSCAR SPANO et al., Interveners and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

February 19, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fullerton & Lang, Frank H. Lang, Jr., and Philip C. Fullerton for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Robert H. Baida, City Attorney, and Alan D. Davidson, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

Dubsick, Helon, Manfredo & Forbes, William E. Forbes, Erskine & Tulley and J. Benton Tulley for Interveners and Respondents.

BROWN (R.M.), J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment against appellants, holding that an ordinance of the City of Fresno is valid and constitutional and that the city may maintain certain trust funds as provided in the ordinance in question.

Appellants H.H. Long, Joseph Bogosian and Charlotte Bogosian, as residents and taxpayers, filed a first amended complaint against the City of Fresno and Wathen Brothers

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases