SEEGMILLER v. HUNT

No. 9933.

15 Utah 2d 269 (1964)

391 P.2d 298

WILLIAM GARTH SEEGMILLER AND MARJORIE SEEGMILLER, D/B/A MADEMOISELLE BEAUTY SALON OR MADEMOISELLE SALON OF BEAUTY, PLAINTIFFS AND APPELLANTS, v. AL HUNT, D/B/A MADEMOISELLE COIFFURES, DEFENDANT, RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 15, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lionel M. Farr, Salt Lake City, Christenson, Novak, Paulson & Taylor, Provo, Philip A. Mallinckrodt, Salt Lake City, for appellants.

Wallace R. Woodbury, Salt Lake City, for respondent.


CALLISTER, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment denying them injunctive relief against the defendant's use of the name "Mademoiselle" in connection with the latter's operation of a beauty parlor. They also appeal from the lower court's judgment that their registration of "Mademoiselle" as a trade name was invalid. Defendant cross-appeals from a denial of costs and damages.

On or about May 1, 1959, plaintiffs commenced operating a beauty parlor in Provo...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases