BALEN v. FRANKLIN


25 Wis.2d 246 (1964)

BALEN, d/b/a BALEN AND ASSOCIATES, Respondent, v. FRANKLIN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 27, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Anderson, Bylsma & Eisenberg of Madison, and oral argument by Donald S. Eisenberg.

For the respondent there was a brief by Lawton & Cates and John C. Carlson, all of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Carlson.


BEILFUSS, J.

The issues resolve themselves into the single question—Is there credible evidence to support the verdict?

The defendant states that his basic contention is that the plaintiff architect is not entitled to compensation under any theory of law because of his failure to submit plans and specifications for the construction of a building in accordance with the cost maximum agreed to by the parties....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases