1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 231 Cal.App.2d
  5. 231 Cal.App.2d 35 (1964)
 

McGILL v. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. 21502.

231 Cal.App.2d 35 (1964)

41 Cal. Rptr. 568

ARTHUR McGILL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

December 4, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Solomon, Polonsky & Miller and Albert E. Polonsky for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, and William F. Bourne for Defendants and Respondents.

DEVINE, J.

Appellant was a motorman employed by the Public Utilities Commission of the City and County of San Francisco for the Municipal Railway. His employment started April 8, 1957, but he was a limited tenure employee under section 145.1 of the city charter until April 17, 1962, when the manager of the railway took the first step to terminate appellant's employment. The manager wrote a letter to the public utilities commission recommending dismissal. The commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases