1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 239 Or.
  5. 239 Or. 26 (1964)
 

ZUMWALT v. LINDLAND

239 Or. 26 (1964)

396 P.2d 205

ZUMWALT v. LINDLAND

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 4, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W.A. Franklin, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Franklin, Olsen, Bennett & Des Brisay and Bernard Jolles, Portland.

Duane Vergeer, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Vergeer & Samuels and Frederick P. Roehr, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

This is an action for damages arising out of a personal injury sustained in an automobile accident. The plaintiff was a guest passenger within the meaning of ORS 30.115. He appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict for the defendant.

Two young men had gone to a dance. Both had been drinking beer. There is no allegation or proof that either was intoxicated. The parties left the dance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases