1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 24 Wis.2d
  5. 24 Wis.2d 239 (1964)
 

POEHLING v. LA CROSSE PLUMBING SUPPLY CO.

24 Wis.2d 239 (1964)

POEHLING, Respondent, v. LA CROSSE PLUMBING SUPPLY COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 2, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Steele, Smyth, Klos & Flynn of La Crosse, and oral argument by Robert D. Smyth.

For the respondent there was a brief by Hale, Skemp, Hanson, Schnurrer & Skemp of La Crosse, and oral argument by T. H. Skemp.

HALLOWS, J.

The gist of the defendant's argument is the abatement suspended the suit for all other purposes and a motion for summary judgment could not be granted. In Truesdill v. Roach (1960), 11 Wis.2d 492, 105 N.W.2d 871, we stated if a plea in abatement is true when interposed it either defeats the pending suit or suspends the suit in which it is interposed except when such...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases