MATTER OF VITO v. DI CARLO


52 Misc.2d 205 (1964)

In the Matter of Peter F. Vito, Petitioner, v. Joseph C. Di Carlo, as Commissioner of Licenses of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

September 29, 1964


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Resnicoff for petitioner. Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel (Thomas C. Patterson of counsel), for respondents.


JOSEPH A. BRUST, J.

This is a proceeding pursuant to article 78 CPLR for an order vacating and annulling respondents' determination which dismissed petitioner from his position as license inspector.

Petitioner was a duly appointed license inspector in the Department of Licenses.

On or about February 5, 1964, respondent Commissioner of Licenses held an inquiry in his office at which petitioner was present and testified concerning certain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases