We affirm the order appealed from upon the opinion of the Surrogate. We would like to note, however, that neither of the cases principally relied upon by the objectant indicates that the Swiss statute must be denied extraterritorial effect. The question here posed was not presented in either Matter of Menschefrend (283 App. Div. 463, affd.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF UTASSI
20 A.D.2d 232 (1964)
In the Matter of the Accounting of Benjamin Nassau, as Administrator C. T. A. of Malvina S. Utassi, Deceased, Respondent In the Matter of the Accounting of Benjamin Nassau, as Ancillary Administrator of The Estate of Etelka Utassi, Deceased, Respondent Louis J. Lefkowitz, as Attorney-General of The State of New York, Appellant; Estate Office of the City of Lucerne, Switzerland, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 4, 1964.
February 4, 1964.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
RABIN, J. P., STEVENS and EAGER, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; STEUER, J., dissents in part in opinion, in which McNALLY, J., concurs.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.