Per Curiam.
The determination as to whether the judgment of June 12, 1962, should be vacated and set aside was in the first instance a matter within the discretion of the trial court.
Near the close of its opinion, the Court of Appeals remarked:
"As we view the situation in the present case, there was a misunderstanding between the court and counsel for the defendants. The trial judge and counsel for the defendants were nonresidents of Vinton...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.