1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 24 Wis.2d
  5. 24 Wis.2d 219 (1964)
 

MACK v. DECKER

24 Wis.2d 219 (1964)

MACK, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. DECKER, Defendant and Respondent: TAFT and another, Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 2, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and Alan M. Clack of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Clack.

For the respondents there was a brief by Charles J. Herro of Oconomowoc, and Robert T. McGraw of Waukesha, guardian ad litem, and oral argument by Mr. McGraw.

CURRIE, C. J.

Appellants make these contentions on this appeal:

(1) There is no credible evidence to support the jury's finding that defendant Taft was causally negligent in stopping his automobile on a public highway.

(2) If this court finds that there is credible evidence to support such finding, a new trial must be had because of prejudicial error.

The second contention is predicated on the refusal of the trial court to admit into evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases