THEURER v. ROMANO


85 N.J. Super. 142 (1964)

204 A.2d 204

J. BEIER THEURER, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, AND WILLIAM L. PHELPS, ET AL., INTERVENERS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. ANTHONY L. ROMANO, STEPHEN CAPPIELLO AND WALTER HAVENS, MEMBERS OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF HOBOKEN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 19, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas P. Calligy argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Daniel F. Gilmore, Assistant Hudson County Counsel, argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. William F. Kelly, Jr., Hudson County Counsel, attorney).

Mr. William Gottlieb argued the cause for respondents (Mr. E. Norman Wilson, City Attorney, filed a statement in lieu of brief for City of Hoboken; Mr. Otmar J. Pellet, of counsel).

Mr. James D. Checki, Jr. argued the cause for interveners-respondents and cross-appellants.

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEWIS.


PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Artaserse, Theurer v. Borrone, 81 N.J.Super. 188 (Law Div. 1963).

On the cross-appeal of the intervening taxpayers concerning assessment of costs, the order of the trial judge is affirmed, there being no showing of mistaken exercise of discretion in relation to the determination thereon.

No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases