CLARK v. MAXWELL

No. 39015.

177 Ohio St. 49 (1964)

CLARK v. MAXWELL, WARDEN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 4, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Arthur Ray Clark, in propria persona.

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, and Mr. William C. Baird, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

In this action in habeas corpus, petitioner is attacking both of his convictions. He urges that both his Stark County and Summit County convictions were invalid because the courts at the preliminary hearings refused to appoint counsel. Under the provisions of Section 2941.50, Revised Code, the right of an indigent to the appointment of counsel at the expense of the state arises after indictment. There is

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases