1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 84 N.J.
  5. 84 N.J. Super. 129 (1964)
 

CHICKACHOP v. MANPOWER, INC.

84 N.J. Super. 129 (1964)

201 A.2d 90

JOSEPH CHICKACHOP, SR., AND JOSEPH CHICKACHOP, JR., BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH CHICKACHOP, SR., PLAINTIFFS, v. MANPOWER, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION AND NEVIN McKAY T/A NEVIN McKAY & COMPANY, DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, v. KREVITZ STEEL COMPANY, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided May 25, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Rudolph J. Rossetti for plaintiffs (Messrs. Epstein & Fluharty, attorneys).

Mr. Arthur Montano for defendant third-party plaintiff Manpower, Inc. (Messrs. Kisselman, Devine, Deighan & Montano, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas A. Lunn for defendant and third-party plaintiff Nevin McKay t/a Nevin McKay & Company (Mr. Samuel P. Orlando, attorney).

Mr. John A. Fratto for third-party defendant (Messrs. Bleakly, Stockwell & Zink, attorneys).

PASCOE, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

This matter concerns two motions for summary judgment by the defendants Manpower, Inc. and Nevin McKay & Company. The grounds for such motions are that the infant plaintiff Joseph Chickachop, Jr., through his guardian ad Litem Joseph Chickachop, Sr., has elected his remedy under the Workmen's Compensation Act of the State of New Jersey, N.J.S.A. 34:15-10. This...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases