MATTER OF BALABAN v. RUBIN


14 N.Y.2d 193 (1964)

In the Matter of Isidore Balaban et al., Appellants, v. Max J. Rubin et al., Constituting the Board of Education of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided May 7, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank H. Gordon and Edward Robin for appellants.

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel (Seymour B. Quel and Benjamin Offner of counsel), for respondents.

Robert L. Carter, Barbara A. Morris, Jawn A. Sandifer and Joan Franklin for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, amicus curiæ.

Leo Pfeffer, Murray A. Gordon, Joseph B. Robison and Carol Weisbrod for American Jewish Congress, amicus curiæ.

Judges DYE, FULD, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN concur with Chief Judge DESMOND; Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents in a separate opinion.


Chief Judge DESMOND.

The question for decision: Will the courts hold invalid the adoption by a board of education of a "zoning plan" for a new public school because the board in addition to other relevant matters took into account, in delimiting the zone, the factor of racial balance in the new school? Stating the issue in another form: Does an otherwise lawful and reasonable districting plan for a newly instituted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases