1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 83 N.J.
  5. 83 N.J. Super. 116 (1964)
 

IN RE FRIEDMAN

83 N.J. Super. 116 (1964)

199 A.2d 46

IN THE MATTER OF THE PROBATE OF THE WILL OF JOSEPH H. FRIEDMAN, DECEASED.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 26, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George N. Arvanitis argued the cause for appellant, Rose Emma Friedman (Mr. George Levinson, attorney; Mr. Robert V. Carton, of counsel).

Mr. Jay R. Benenson argued the cause for respondent, David E. Feldman, Executor of the Estate of Joseph H. Friedman, deceased (Messrs. Furst, Furst & Feldman, attorneys).

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and SULLIVAN.

PER CURIAM.

The issue presented on this appeal is whether appellant, who denominates herself Rose Emma Friedman, but is referred to by respondent as "Rose Emma Gross, also known as Rose Emma Friedman," possesses legal status to prosecute a caveat against probate of the will of Joseph H. Friedman, deceased. The Monmouth County Court, Probate Division, held she did not, and dismissed her caveat. In the order the court also expressly adjudicated that "Rose Gross, also...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases