Per Curiam.
Petitioner bases his right to release on two grounds. First, that he was arrested without a warrant, and, second, that evidence was admitted during his trial which was obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure. The same argument was presented to the trial court, and after a hearing thereon the evidence was admitted.
A search without warrant incident to and contemporaneous with a valid arrest does not violate the constitutional...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.