Per Curiam.
It is petitioner's contention that the grand jury which returned the indictment against him was improperly summoned, thus rendering the indictment void. He bases this argument on the alleged facts that the clerk did not make the proper lists, and that at least two of the grand jurors were not served with summons but were called by telephone and asked to serve.
Irregularities in the selecting, drawing or summoning of grand jurors which do...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
