Per Curiam.
The primary contention of relator in this appeal is that the action of the clerk in levying execution on his money in the hands of the sheriff for the payment of the costs was illegal. He argues that, inasmuch as he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to the reformatory, the state and not he is liable for the costs.
Although relator cites as his authority Section 2949.14, Revised Code, apparently he is relying on the provisions of Section 2949...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
