1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 5 Ohio
  5. 5 Ohio App. 2d 171 (1964)
 

IN RE APPROPRIATION FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES

Nos. 661, 662, 663 and 664.

5 Ohio App. 2d 171 (1964)

IN RE APPROPRIATION FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES: BAUGHMAN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS, APPELLANT. IN RE APPROPRIATION FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES: ELSEA ET AL., APPELLEES, v. DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS, APPELLANT. IN RE APPROPRIATION FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES: HALEY ET AL., APPELLEES, v. DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS, APPELLANT. (Two cases.)

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Hancock County.

Decided November 13, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William B. Saxbe, attorney general, Mr. Allan D. Dobnicker and Mr. John R. Lindsey, for appellant, Director of Highways.

Messrs. Adams & Bechtel and Messrs. Betts & Betts, for appellees, landowners.

GUERNSEY, J.

In each of the above-captioned highway appropriation cases appeals on questions of law have been perfected by the Director of Highways from judgments of the Common Pleas Court of Hancock County entered pursuant to landowners' motions. As the same issues were raised by each appeal they have been argued and will be considered together.

In the Baughman case the judgment entry of the Common Pleas Court recited that no evidence was adduced at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases