RICE v. RIGSBY

No. 315.

136 S.E.2d 35 (1964)

261 N.C. 687

Ed RICE, Plaintiff, v. William RIGSBY, Defendant.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 29, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. E. Leake, Marshall, for plaintiff.

Williams, Williams & Morris, Asheville, for defendant.


PER CURIAM.

The testimony of both plaintiff and defendant that defendant was neither drunk nor under the influence of any intoxicant at the time his automobile overturned and injured plaintiff is set at naught by the allegation in plaintiff's complaint that defendant was operating his motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicating beverage and that such operation was the proximate cause of his injuries. The opinion in Davis v. Rigsby, supra, is controlling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases