CONROY v. PURCARO


42 N.J. 120 (1964)

199 A.2d 643

PATRICK CONROY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NICHOLAS PURCARO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 20, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bernard Chazen argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Nathan Baker, of counsel; Messrs. Baker, Garber & Chazen, attorneys).

Mr. Robert L. Clifford argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Egan, O'Donnell, Hanley & Clifford, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

This is an automobile accident case. The jury found for defendant and the Appellate Division affirmed. We granted certification. 41 N.J. 195 (1963).

Plaintiff parked his car on the shoulder of a highway. He opened the door on the driver's side and attempted to emerge. Defendant, approaching from behind, apparently first hit the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases