1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 393 P.2d
  5. 393 P.2d 852 (1964)
 

SHOOK v. COOPER

No. 40499.

393 P.2d 852 (1964)

Howard B. SHOOK ex rel. Threadgill & O'Donnell, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Clomer E. COOPER, d/b/a Cooper Dairy Supply, and W-P Milling Company, a corporation, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 30, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Threadgill & O'Donnell, Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error.

Gable, Gotwals & Hays and Eugene A. Hoefling, Tulsa, for defendant in error, W-P Milling Co., a corp.

Eugene Carr, Tulsa, for defendant in error, Clomer E. Cooper, d/b/a Cooper Dairy Supply.

JOHNSON, Justice.

The facts briefly stated are: The law firm of Threadgill and O'Donnell were employed June 15, 1962, by Howard B. Shook to represent him in a claim against Beatrice Food Company arising out of an account upon a fifty percent contingent fee basis. On the same day the attorneys filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Tulsa County the action asking for a recovery of an estimated amount of $1,400.00 for merchandise sold and delivered by Howard B. Shook...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases