SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.
United States, on behalf of the Secretary of the Interior, Intervenor.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued June 19, 1964.
Decided November 9, 1964.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Harry A. Poth, Jr., Washington, D. C. (Robert C. Woodbury, New York City, Peyton G. Bowman, III, and Reid & Priest, Washington, D. C., and Arthur M. Williams, Jr., Columbia, S. C., on brief), for petitioner.
Paul A. Sweeney, Atty., F.P.C. (Richard A. Solomon, Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Sol., Thomas M. Debevoise, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Joseph B. Hobbs, Atty., F.P.C., on brief), for respondent.
Edward Berlin, Atty., Dept. of Justice (John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sherman L. Cohn, Atty., Dept. of Justice, on brief), for intervenor.
Before BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and HEMPHILL, District Judge.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge:
The Federal Power Commission has assessed the South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, under § 10(f) of the Federal Power Act,1 for benefits to its hydroelectric plant on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina accruing from the erection by the Government of an upstream dam and reservoir. Petitioning2 us to review and set aside the order, the Company asserts that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
