1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 231 F.Supp.
  5. 231 F.Supp. 986 (1964)
 

RAILROAD YARDMASTERS v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RY. CO.

Civ. A. No. 3-634.

231 F.Supp. 986 (1964)

RAILROAD YARDMASTERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Plaintiff, v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Texas, Dallas Division.

August 5, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mullinax, Wells, Morris & Mauzy, Charles J. Morris, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff.

Burford, Ryburn & Ford, by Sam P. Buford and Robt. E. Burns, Dallas, Tex. (Allen, Gambill & Gambill, Ft. Worth, Tex., Ernest D. Grinnell, Jr., Paul R. Moody, St. Louis, Mo., of counsel), for defendant.

HUGHES, District Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

1. Plaintiff is Railroad Yardmasters of America, AFL-CIO, hereinafter called Union. Defendant is St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, hereinafter called Railroad.

2. Yardmasters is an unincorporated association organized for the purposes of a labor organization and is certified by the National Mediation Board pursuant to the Railway Labor Act, 44 Stat. L. 555; 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-163, as the

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases