1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 232 F.Supp.
  5. 232 F.Supp. 939 (1964)
 

BACHER v. PATENCIO

No. 64-515.

232 F.Supp. 939 (1964)

William A. BACHER, Joseph H. Sage, Raymond Baddour and Milton Goldman, Plaintiffs, v. Joseph Patrick PATENCIO and Clarence A. Brechlin, as Conservator of the Estate of Joseph Patrick Patencio, Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. California, Central Division.

August 12, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Saul Ruskin, Francis H. O'Neil, Richard L. Huxtable, William G. Coskran, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Raymond C. Simpson, Long Beach, Cal., for defendant Joseph Patrick Patencio.

James Hollowell, Palm Springs, Cal., for Clarence A. Brechlin, conservator.

BYRNE, District Judge.

Since this case involves a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the substantive facts stated herein are only those pleaded in the complaint.

On April 17, 1964, William A. Bacher, Joseph H. Sage, Raymond Baddour, and Milton Goldman, plaintiffs, filed this action for specific performance and damages against Joseph Patrick Patencio and Clarence A. Brechlin (sometimes hereafter referred to as defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases