1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 394 P.2d
  5. 394 P.2d 774 (1964)
 

MONTGOMERY WARD v. THOMAS

No. 469.

394 P.2d 774 (1964)

MONTGOMERY WARD, an illinois corporation, Appellant. v. Charles C. THOMAS and Mae O. Thomas, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

August 10, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R.J. Annis, Robertson, Monagle, Eastaugh & Annis, Juneau, for appellant.

Donald L. Craddick, Faulkner, Banfield, Boochever & Doogan, Juneau, for appellees.

Before NESBETT, C.J., and DIMOND and AREND, JJ.

NESBETT, Chief Justice.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the denial of appellant's motion for a new trial was an abuse of discretion.

At the outset it should be understood that the policy of this court as stated in Ahlstrom v. Cummings1 is that the granting or refusal of a request for a new trial rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge. This court will not overrule

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases