KENT v. UNITED STATES


228 F.Supp. 929 (1964)

Sidney KENT, doing business as Dorald Engineering Company, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 8, 1964.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. Ben Greenman, New York City, for plaintiff.

Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty. for Southern Dist. of New York, for the United States; Philip H. Schaeffer, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel.


WYATT, District Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment by plaintiff. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a).

The government as defendant has asked in an opposing affidavit for summary judgment in its favor and, if otherwise entitled to such judgment, the government may be granted that relief without formal written cross-motion, either (a) on the ground that an oral cross-motion was in effect made at the hearing of the motion or (b) on the ground that no cross-motion is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases