1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 393 P.2d
  5. 393 P.2d 749 (1964)
 

FOOTHILLS HOLDING CORP. v. TULSA RIG, REEL & MFG. CO.

No. 20499.

393 P.2d 749 (1964)

FOOTHILLS HOLDING CORP. and Kenneth H. Gantenbein, Plaintiffs in Error, v. TULSA RIG, REEL AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado. In Department.

July 6, 1964.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred J. Capra, Denver, for plaintiff in error Foothills Holding Corp.

Robert W. Caddes, Denver, for plaintiff in error Kenneth H. Gantenbein.

Holme, Roberts, More & Owen, Richard L. Schrepferman, Donald K. Bain, Denver, for defendant in error.

DAY, Justice.

We will refer to plaintiffs in error as Foothills and Gantenbein and to the defendant in error as Tulsa.

The latter filed three separate complaints in the Jefferson County District Court against Foothills and Gantenbein. Each action alleged the execution and delivery of a promissory note by Foothills and Gantenbein to Tulsa, each secured by a deed of trust executed by Foothills. The respective complaints alleged default in the obligations and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases