CREDIT DEPT. v. RAMP MAINT. CORP.


44 Misc.2d 1094 (1964)

Credit Department, Inc., Respondent, v. Ramp Maintenance Corp., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

December 16, 1964


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Friedlander & Gaines (Norbert Ruttenberg of counsel), for appellant. Milton Kostroff and Joseph Untermeyer for respondent.

Concur — GULOTTA, PETTE and GROAT, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The purpose of subdivision 7 of section 684 of the Civil Practice Act was to reach all variable commission earnings, whatever method of settlement with its employee the employer might elect to adopt. (Davidow v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 231 App. Div. 300.)

Furthermore, under present business practice an employer can by his own system, voluntarily adopted, no more excuse a failure to make a garnishee deduction than he can a...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases