SUTTON, Justice.
This writ of error involves the propriety of the granting of a motion to dismiss at the conclusion of Harris' evidence in a trial to the court. Harris, as plaintiff in error, alleges that the court: "granted defendant's Motion to Dismiss without making findings of fact or conclusions of law, either oral or written" as required by R.C.P.Colo.Rules 41 (b) (1) and 52(a), the latter as interpreted in our opinion in Mowry v. Jackson, 140 Colo. 197,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.