Defendant, a nondomiciliary foreign corporation moves, pursuant to subdivision 8 of rule 3211 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, for a judgment dismissing the action on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction over defendant. This gives rise to the question whether plaintiff has shown enough to establish that defendant was doing business in New York sufficient for jurisdiction pursuant to section 301
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IRGANG v. PELTON & CRANE CO.
42 Misc.2d 70 (1964)
Florence Irgang, Plaintiff, v. Pelton & Crane Company, Defendant.
Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 3, 1964
March 3, 1964
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison (
Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.